in this case, the fbi agent has the author tight make the decision. subject to the board of supervisors it would be devoted to that and that is a big distinction. the information, older than six months and that is not protected the same way other communications would be. >> and in this situation we're talking about a military general. the standards are so high with military conduct. is that something that should be relooked and we should be up in someone's business about? >> that is a troubling question, i think. we ask the service members to undertake great risks and make sacrifices for us, and we seem to hold them to a different set of standards. >> he's the director of the cia. >> right. >> and if he's the top spy in the top spy network in the world and is doing something this stupid, that is a standard there? >> if he was not compromising national security, he was compromising his marriage. >> right job, and -- >> he's a top spy and should know people would be look at him. does he have a different standard? >> petraeus crow rewrote the rules in ma